{"id":5661,"date":"2022-05-16T17:30:07","date_gmt":"2022-05-16T15:30:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/pr.gagadget.com\/portless-iphones-will-be-the-future-for-most-but-usb-c-iphones-still-make-sense\/"},"modified":"2022-05-16T17:30:07","modified_gmt":"2022-05-16T15:30:07","slug":"portless-iphones-will-be-the-future-for-most-but-usb-c-iphones-still-make-sense","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/pr.gagadget.com\/en\/portless-iphones-will-be-the-future-for-most-but-usb-c-iphones-still-make-sense\/","title":{"rendered":"Portless iPhones will be the future for most, but USB-C iPhones still make sense"},"content":{"rendered":"
Portless iPhones will be the future for most, but USB-C iPhones still make sense<\/div>\n
\n
\n

Apple<\/a> has long been expected to transition to fully portless iPhones at some point, and for most users that makes perfect sense. But we\u2019re seeing growing reports that the iPhone maker is first going to switch from Lightning to USB-C, and that raises a key question.<\/p>\n

Is USB-C just a brief interim stage before iPhones go fully wireless, or do USB-C iPhones have a longer future \u2026 ?<\/p>\n

<\/span>\n\t\t<\/p>\n

Recent reports<\/h2>\n

Two recent reports suggest that Apple plans to switch to a USB-C iPhone port next year. Ming-Chi Kuo made the initial report, before Bloomberg<\/em> corroborated.<\/p>\n

Note that neither report means this is definitely happening. Kuo based his on supply-chain reports, and we noted at the time the uncertainties regarding these.<\/p>\n

\n

Apple likes to have multiple suppliers wherever possible, to allow it to negotiate better prices, and to reduce risk. If, for example, a major supplier of Lightning ports were to report Apple was planning to cut orders next year, that could mean nothing more than a rejigging of competing suppliers.<\/p>\n

Similarly, USB-C suppliers talking about expecting a major boost in orders next year might again simply be Apple or other companies increasing orders with some suppliers while reducing them with others. <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Bloomberg\u2019s<\/em> report was instead based on internal testing of a USB-C iPhone. I\u2019m sure that report is accurate, but again, it doesn\u2019t amount to proof. There is precisely a 100% chance that there have been USB-C iPhone prototypes within Apple\u2019s labs for years now. Does \u2018testing\u2019 mean simply experimenting with these, or something on a more formal and larger scale?<\/p>\n

However, both sources seem reasonably confident in their predictions, so let\u2019s assume for now that they are correct. What does this mean for the future of iPhone ports? Here are my brief thoughts.<\/p>\n

It would be an overdue move<\/h2>\n

I\u2019m a big fan of port standardization in general, and of USB-C in particular. My ideal is a day when absolutely all wired connections are USB-C to USB-C, and I can finally ditch five of the six trays of cables I have, not to mention the additional one with assorted adapters.<\/p>\n

I was a bit skeptical of Kuo\u2019s report for this reason. While I\u2019d welcome it, my immediate question was \u2018why now?\u2019. Apple started the switched to USB-C in the Mac back in 2016, and the iPad in 2018, so why wait another four years before the iPhone belatedly follows suit?<\/p>\n

In particular, if Apple is heading toward portless iPhones, why go through the disruption now of a wired port change that would last for perhaps two or three years before a fully wireless iPhone?<\/p>\n

If the reports are accurate, this is a very overdue move.<\/p>\n

Most will be happy with portless iPhones<\/h2>\n

One possible explanation for the latter point is simply that the portless reports aren\u2019t<\/em> true, and Apple plans to stick with a wired charging and data-transfer connection option for the foreseeable future. However, I don\u2019t buy that, for several reasons.<\/p>\n

First, a portless iPhone is absolutely in line with Apple\u2019s design direction. Sure, things have changed a little since Jony Ive left, but I do believe that his \u201csingle slab of glass\u201d vision is Apple\u2019s ultimate goal. <\/p>\n

Second, eliminating a port reduces manufacturing cost and complexity. This, too, is absolutely in line with the company\u2019s ethos \u2013 as the removal of the headphone jack demonstrated.<\/p>\n

Third, removing the port improves reliability. It takes away the biggest entry point for dust and water, which will likely significantly boost the waterproofing standard. Additionally, it ends the fraying Lightning cable issue!<\/p>\n

Finally, most iPhone owners don\u2019t need<\/em> a port \u2013 and even fewer will do so in the future. Few iPhone owners ever do any wired data-transfer, and most people can get their charging needs met through overnight wireless charging. For top-up charges, we\u2019re seeing a growing number of wireless charging pads in cars, coffee shops, hotels, airports, offices \u2026 you name it. This trend will only continue. Same for power banks with MagSafe charging capabilities.<\/p>\n

But there are still people who need a wired port<\/h2>\n

Apple cannot have things both ways: argue that the iPhone is a suitable camera for professional video use (albeit mostly as a B-cam or C-cam) while at the same time removing the only practical way to transfer significant amounts of 4K (and later 8K) video footage.<\/p>\n

If you\u2019re using an iPhone for pro video shoots, a wired port is a necessity, and USB-C is much better than Lightning.<\/p>\n

Similarly, there will be a minority of people for whom wireless charging isn\u2019t practical. If you are a really heavy iPhone user, and need to go significant periods between charges, then the faster speed of wireless charging may be a necessity rather than a luxury.<\/p>\n

So there will always be some who need a wired connection (at least until wireless charging and wireless data transfer offer speed much closer to wired connections), even if they are a minority.<\/p>\n

What\u2019s my best guess?<\/h2>\n

I can see one of two things happening, at the point where Apple feels ready to make the change to portless iPhones.<\/p>\n

First, the standard iPhone model(s) go portless, while the Pro models retain a wired port. This would make for a worthwhile point of differentiation for more serious iPhone users, while the vast majority of consumers will remain happy with wireless charging and AirDrop.<\/p>\n

Or second, have the iPhone Pro Max be the only model to continue to offer a USB-C port. This would again be consistent with certain features being exclusive to the largest and most expensive model \u2013 like sensor shift and 2.5x optional zoom being exclusive to the iPhone 12 Pro Max.<\/p>\n

I think Apple could probably take the second approach without upsetting too many people. Videographers are likely to appreciate the larger screen of the Pro Max, while anyone needing to push battery usage to the limits will obviously be buying the Pro Max for its longer battery life. So the two groups who most benefit from a wired port are already likely to choose the top-end model.<\/p>\n

So that\u2019s my bet. Sometime within the next few years, all but the iPhone Pro Max go portless, while the Pro Max gets or keeps a USB-C port. What\u2019s your view? Please take our poll and share your thoughts in the comments.<\/p>\n

<\/a>\n<\/p>\n

<\/div>\n

\n

\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/9to5mac.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2022\/05\/Portless-iPhones-vs-USB-C-iPhones.jpg?resize=1200%2C628&quality=82&strip=all&ssl=1<\/div>\n
https:\/\/9to5mac.com\/2022\/05\/16\/portless-iphones-usb-c-iphones\/<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Portless iPhones will be the future for most, but USB-C iPhones still make sense Apple has long been expected to transition to fully portless iPhones at some point, and for most users that makes perfect sense. But we\u2019re seeing growing reports that the iPhone maker is first going to switch from Lightning to USB-C, and […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":5662,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/pr.gagadget.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5661"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/pr.gagadget.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/pr.gagadget.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pr.gagadget.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pr.gagadget.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5661"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/pr.gagadget.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5661\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pr.gagadget.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/5662"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/pr.gagadget.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5661"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pr.gagadget.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5661"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pr.gagadget.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5661"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}